Re: Another example why I dislike .DSK format

[Aley Keprt]

But simple the support of DSK (or SAD) should be preserved too, since it's 
good for its simplicity and so many utils can work with it (them).

----------------------------------------------------------
Mgr.(MSc.) Ales Keprt (also known as Aley)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** www.keprt.cz *** ICQ: 82357182
Dept. of Computer Science, VSB Technical University
Ostrava, CZ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.cs.vsb.cz
----------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Door�" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no>
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: Another example why I dislike .DSK format


Aley Keprt wrote:
And of course, .SAM means "sample", it's used for years for sound 
samples. :-)
And AMIPro Word docs and a myriad of others :-)
> Don't we have SDF or something, which is a generic Sam disk format?
From what I understand SDF is a discontinued format and this spawned the 
discussion on a generic format for representing all sam disk geometrys 
with headers for containing information and such like.

The reason for persevering with the DSK format is for simplicity but as I 
have said in the NVG re-org mails but as soon as a format is available 
they will all get moved into this format and hopefully the complications 
of dealing with the mish-mash of DSK/TD0/SADv1/SADv2/MGT/PAK/LIB/SBT 
formats will be over.

Dan.