Please disregard last message: I'm being stupid.
I wrote:
> See I disagree about this...
>
> Won't it be
>
> [4]
> [4]
> Loop around:
> {3},{1 WAIT} 4 cycles
> {5},[3 of 5] 8 cycles
> [2 of 5],[2 of 4] 4 cycles
> [2 of 4], {2 WAIT} 4 cycles
Ignore me. I've missed a [4] out.
Geoff
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
