On Apr 27, 2:31pm in "Re: The MiDGET", you warbled:
] >
] > On 27 Apr 94 11:32:51 GMT, Simon Cooke said:
] >
] > [lots of quotes up to a depth of about 5!]
] >
] > I haven't seen a single one of the quoted articles, and it's rather
] > confusing to be thrown right into the middle of *this* conversation! ;-)
]
] Funny. They've all been posted to the mailing list, so you should have got
] them if you subscribe...
]
] There's something weird going on here...
What's the betting they've been using reply-to-all instead of just
reply-to-sender...
which means that they won't have noticed that the reply line is still
fucked-up...
Can something be done about that, btw, arnt?
Certainly my mailer (at least) needs an extra `>' on the end of the
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] bit
Cheers...
Geoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- INET)
__ __ __ An expert is someone | I may be wrong: I thought we said
|\ /|| || ) ( _) who can read the system | It couldn't happen here... - PSB
||\/|||--||-( _\\ manual pages faster | These opinions are my own. If
|| ||| || \(__/ than anyone else... | anyone agrees, more fool them.
