> On 29 Apr 94 14:39:02 GMT, Simon Cooke said: > > *grins* well... depends on access time. We're looking for 80ns at the > > moment, due to the speed of the processor involved. > > If I remember correctly, some are 70ns and some are 80ns. Also, some of > them are 9 bits wide... > > imc
Yeah, but I don't really need the parity bits -- they're just for hardware that checks memory validity that way. Later, Si +------------------INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "You know... you can tell someone's vain when they quote themselves | | in their own .sig file..." -- Simon Cooke | +--------------------JANET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
