> On Mon, 24 Oct 1994 13:13:51 GMT, Simon Cooke said: > > apparently the "design group" are having problems getting enough > > drives smaller than 40Mb to work with -- ie I think we're talking > > stupid file system that can't handle more than 40Mb HD's here folks... > > Urgh... I doubt I'd take anything less than 100Mb.
Yeah -- stupid, isn't it? > The +3 manages perfectly OK (except for the bug which leaves the "T:" in the > filename if you save "t:foo"). > > > LOAD p<number> instead of LOAD <number> > > Hang on... p<number> is the name of a variable. That's a rather strange > syntax. Come to think of it, how will you tell the difference between > LOAD d1 a$ (where a$ contains a file name) > > and > > LOAD d1a$ (where d1a$ contains a file name) > > given that spaces are allowed in variable names? WEll... it's the syntax used on the disciple and +D; I think it requires a space, so it's not all user friendly. Again, Bob's being a plank. Oh, the MultIROM should be out by July at the very latest (possibly a cut down version before then), and will have a UNIX based DOS in it. Si
