On <25 Oct 94 15:38> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 D.> The Lord of Adders black did speaketh:

 >> From: sam-users-owner
 >> To: sam
 >> Subject: SAM C compiler
 >> Date: 25 October 1994 15:29
 >>
 >> Geoff Winkly man said
 >>
 >> > So when does C++ get added?
 >>
 >> Why do you want C++ - it's a bag of shit

 D.> Too right, C++ is pap - If I wanted to
 D.> messed about by classes and
 D.> such like, I would have become a teacher.

 >>
 >> >Well, I'll pay 20 quid for it if it's
 >> >not PD. Any more and I'll spend
 D.> the
 >> >hassle porting Hitech C, cos at least
 >> >I'll know that'll work well
 D.> :)
 >>
 >> I agree - 20 or even 30
 >>

 D.> 20 yes, 30's a bit steep.

 >> Lord B'


 D.> Dan Doore

     Small-C is PD and this small-c port is just that, so the compiler has to 
be free! If he owns the editor or is licesned he can charge for that and 
*maybe* any unique io routines to talk to the sam operating system, as long as 
they're his own work entirely!
     I do realise though that it's everyone else not the person whose ported 
it that's talking of paying cash for the pd product,

     All that aside Small-c version2 is infinatly better than spectrum HiSoft 
C even if it isn't an ANSI compliant C! floats arn't a great loss in C but 
many file processing utils would be lost without long & ulong data types!
     I'll have a look at the cp/m port and cpc native ports to see what's 
involved, when I get some free time:-)

     I hope he's altered the optimiser so that it correctly recognises the new 
comet assembler source format....

     The porting of HiTech C to sam native mode would be a bit difficult as 
the supplied source only covers all the lib functions and the C.COM 
commandline parser/pseudo-make part.
     The source to the pre-processor, syntax-checker, code-generator, 
peep-hole optimiser, assembler and linker they've kept to tghemselves to stop 
complete ports! There's only enough to make a cross-compiler from CP/M.

CYL.
Johnathan.


___ Olms 1.60 [Evaluation]

 
--
|Fidonet:  Johnathan Taylor 2:2501/307
|Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.

Reply via email to