On (19 Jan 95) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in response to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Simon Cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1995 12:07:47 +0000 (GMT)
[IDE-interface] >>> reduce your designing&development overheads:-) > Yes please :) If we had bigger SAM boxes we could put the design we've > got on the MultiROM, but we haven't :( Ok, 60x70mm PCB. it hangs off the pins 1-20 side of the z80 socket, requires z80 A0-A7,D0-D7,/IORQ,/RD,/WR,/RESET,CPU-CLK,+5V,0V to be connected to the fake z80 socket. IDE-Bus socket is on opposite end of the PCB. I/O allocations are 0n6H to 0nfH inclusive, command block is 0n8H to 0nfH the 2 lower addresses are for the alternate control/status registers, 'n' is the link-presetable high-nibble of the address that makes it generic:-) [more termite] > Yeah -- don't worry, I've got it covered. You can even call scripts > within scripts -- fully nested to 256 levels is the plan... And I'm > sticking an up-to-4Mb disk cache in the system... That'll be a nice luxury! regards Johnathan. ... Get stoned, drink liquid cement. -- |Fidonet: Johnathan Taylor 2:2501/307.9 |Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.
