On Tue, 24 Jan 95 14:36:00 PST, Doore, Daniel [MIS] said: > Probably because it's a darn site quicker to play 'shift the ASCII > character into memory' than prat about with bespoke compression code.
Which brings us back to my original question which put forward the supposition that he didn't "have to" hack the printer code but it was less bother than formulating a routine to decompress the code... imc
