> To Quote [EMAIL PROTECTED] : > Okay, can I just say that I agree with the 'Leave the Sam as it is.' Group of > people, partly because I doubt I'll ever buy anything that upgrades the Sam > past it's present standard, and I'd get upset if people started publishing > stuff that I couldn't use because of the fact. > > The Sam has a small enought user base as it is, I don't want it to be split > up > or grow any smaller. > > Tim
Okay.... but what if I told you that a lot of the hardware we've got doesn't actually WORK the way we need it to? And how about a hard-drive, or high density disk drives??? Simon ps I'm talking about (a) the SAMBus Clock, which seems to corrupt itself now and then, (b) the 8MHz clock on the drive lines, (c) the pinout on the Comms Interface (which could do with some extra lines for idiotic terminal devices and printers)...
