> > > That sounds like tosh to me. Have you any evidence to back up your > > > allegation? > > > Not wanting to start trouble, but try November 30 1994 16:52, > > OK, I did, and I found this: > |If you are into flames, I suggest that next time you send a 2-line message, > |you do not add an 11-line signature and 4 blank lines to the bottom.
Ta Da! What you fail to understand is that it is not the words themselves that cause offence, it's the self-righteous undertones that seen to run riot in some of your postings to this group. > And, the next day, this (which was in reply to LB, not to PAF). This makes no odds at all. > |I don't make the rules. See net.announce.newusers and lots of news posting > |software for the signature size restriction. This just clarifies the point. > And that is just about that. So, like I said, the above allegation > sounds like tosh to me. To you maybe, but not in my eyes, and definitely not in those of Pauls. Dan Doore. > imc
