> >ps I'm thinking of putting the source to SAMDOS 2.2 up on the Net if I get > >Bruce's permission... comments? > > Why? Didn't Andy Wright do that on the MGT Discs? Or was that just the ROM?
Only the ROM. -Frode
- Not very controversial, but the best I can do... R J Partington
- Re: Not very controversial, but the best I can d... Geoff Winkless
- Re: Not very controversial, but the best I c... R J Partington
- Re: Not very controversial, but the best... Ian . Collier
- Re: Not very controversial, but the ... Simon Cooke
- Re: Not very controversial, but... Ian . Collier
- Re: Not very controversial, but... slawek
- Re: Not very controversial, but the best I c... Simon Cooke
- Re: Not very controversial, but the best I can d... L . Willis
- Re: Not very controversial, but the best I can d... Will Easson
- Re: Not very controversial, but the best I can d... Frode Tenneboe
- Re: Not very controversial, but the best I can d... Geoff Winkless
- Re: Not very controversial, but the best I can d... Geoff Winkless
- Re: Not very controversial, but the best I c... Ian . Collier
- Re: Not very controversial, but the best I can d... Geoff Winkless
- Re: Not very controversial, but the best I can d... Brian Gaff Sam Dept.
