> Frode Tenneboe wrote...
> > 
> > SOME of the drivers??? My guess is that you can junk around 70% of
> > everything that's in there. What is the point of having support for
> > Appleshare, 387 emulation, support for X number of filesystems, umsdos-
> > support, cd-rom (perhaps in the future? :), etc.
> 
> Well, in my current kernel, all I have is IDE support, filesystems (msdos,
> minix,ext2), networking (slip,ppp) and a cdrom driver (because it's ATAPI,
> not standard IDE). My kernel is 334k compressed. No idea how big a minimal
> kernel is.

Striped and compiled with -O2?
I've just heard about an Ultrix kernels < 256Kb.
And don't forget that's compiled C. You _will_ get a smaller kernel
if written in assembly..if feasable these days.

> 
> > > I've got ArmLinux on my 4MB A5000 (Archimedes). That doesn't run at
> > > all... :(
> > 
> > Minix ran on an 8086 with 640K.
> 
> Ah, but Minix is a bit grotty (from what I've read/heard)...

But it's still (sort of) Unix.

> 
> > > I'll be in it if people are going to give it a go...
> > 
> > I might. If we do a propper design, we might be able to split
> > the thing up into parts that can be coded indvidually. 
> 
> Much like the original Linux... :)

Yeah. Well, most of the stuff was there before they split things
into parts. It's very much of a one man job in there.

> 
> > Running X on a machine with only 4Mb is darn slow.
> 
> I suffered this for exactly 3 days before I went to buy more memory. Mind
> you, the X server that comes with linux could probably be trimmed a bit...

Ehm..it's based on FreeX86 you know....

> 
> > I'd rather have multiple virtual terminals,
> 
> You should see me trying to use DOS. Flailing wildly at the CTRL+ALT+Fx
> keys...
> 
> > Forth for SAM - isn't that a step backwrds? :)
> 
> In what sense? Small(ish) programs, 'dumpable' as executables, 'suspendable'
> if I can figure out how to do it cleanly. Someone wanted a text editor which
> could sit in high memory until called... I'm working on it, but it'll be
> written in FORTH if anything. Progress reports when I can get the bloody
> thing working......

Let me see...the last time I did anything in FORTH (7 years - but I guess
there will never be an object FORTH? :), it was horrid with all the 
strange semantics and RPN :)

 -Frode

Reply via email to