> What about the +2A? IIRC that's a +3 without the disk drive, wheras the +2 > was an earlier and entirely different design. >
I've never understood why everybody hated the +2a - I realise that there were a few incompatibility problems, but apart form that, surely Amstrad's modifications can only have been good. I think the reason speccy owners hate it is becaause it's *too* developed for a machine bearing a Sinclair name! What? A *decent* keyboard? A disc system that doesn't need some cock-eyed interfacing system?! Andy
