> Who actually owns the copyright of the SAM Robot anyway? In my book the use of the SAM character in SAM stuff is perfectly justified, and should be encouraged. I can imagine that the copyright holders would be eager to see the image used in this way, especially considering it was originally intended to be associated with the machine.
However, I do not approve of the use of the character to promote unrelated or things that go against the SAM. I consider anyone who uses it unaccredited, and suggests it is their own work, totaly out of order. This is the issue at hand. C9, Numbly. Rocking what boat? Any difference of opinion on the list concerning the rights of other members is irrelevent.
