> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: Re: THE NSSS > Datum: Tuesday, January 26, 1999 8:11 > > In a message dated 24/01/99 11:39:15, you write:
> >David Tonks has asked me to explain why he did not attend the last > >Gloucester show. > >He say`s he was phoned on the Friday before the show, asking if he was > >going, he said he wasn`t, he was then told he could have a free stall, he > >still said that he could not attend, the reason being that he was asked to > >work on the Saturday and therefore it was a question of going to the show > >and possibly losing money, or working and making money, and as Dave > >explained, his family & his job come before anything else. > Untrue. Give me one good reason why i shoud believe you instead of Malcom. Did you know it is rather bad manners to chop the name of the one you are replying to of this email. <snipped the bit about free tables) > Having had no reply from the letter, Jean Tonks was phoned (IIRC about two > weeks before the show) and she confirmed that they would be coming. Jean has > always been the person who dealt with the shows, not Dave. We had no reason to > believe they were not coming and space was left for them right up to the last > moment. Needless to say we were a little angry on the day as this was not the > first time that they had said they were coming to a show and then failed to > arrive. So did you asked them after the show why they did not come? They could have a very good reason for not attending the show. But from your story there is no way telling if you ever asked them, why not? Therefore this is a rather strange reply because you have no clue whatsoever in why they did not come to the show and only used it as a excuse (being a rather pathetic one) in trying to blame Malcom that he is telling a untrue story. -- Robert van der Veeke, aka RJV Graphics [EMAIL PROTECTED] Currently listening to : Bannoubunka Nekomusume - My Dearest friends
