Andrew Collier wrote: > Okay, I've just noticed that they indeed do have to be distributed > seperately, but that should then fit the terms. Actually, since the LGPL (...) > PS. This is getting *way* off topic. Can we do something more appropriate > with it? It's been a while since anyone posted to oxbridge.tat; perhaps...
How about news:free.software.open-source ? I think this is a newish group, and it seems rather suitable. -- James Gasson
