On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Aley Keprt wrote: > > %!$$ *&& Aley - look at the context. I'm not talking about documented > > code, I'm talking about a "todo list and some changelogs" which _you_ were > > asking for. > > What? Stuart Brady was asking, not me.
Sorry, you're right, it was Stuart who asked for the "todo list and some changelogs". But I was replying to that particular paragraph when you challenged me about my use of the phrase "useless documentation". > > I'm not saying it would be useless to him, but that it would be useless to > > anyone else. Without the source there's nothing you can do with that sort > > of text, and it's just wasting Si's time keeping it presentable. I imagine > > he *is* keeping his own notes and docs, but it would be a waste of his > > time, at the moment, to write those up in such a way that others could see > > and understand them. > > Without sources? Are you silly??? I can't believe you wrote this... But you *don't* have the Win32 sources. This is what you're all complaining about. > Nobody wanted documentation without program and sources. I understood Stuart's email to mean that he wanted access to the todo list and changelog, even if Si hadn't released the source yet. Quite what he thought he'd do with it is another question entirely. Anrew -- -- Andrew Collier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- My other -- http://mnemotech.ucam.org -- .sig is a -- Part 3 Materials Science, Cambridge -- PDF file --
