> Paul Walker wrote: > > >Either way, the answer is "more than you'd think". I'm with whoever > >suggested .saz, since it follows the .tar.gz -> .taz (or .tgz) example. Or > >provide two versions of the file, or .. oh sod it, use long filenames. Who > >cares anyway? > > You should be able to use either, unless of course you're using DOS. I > think that just for the DOS users, we could use saz for downloads. > -- > Stuart Brady
Just a request. Don't break the support for older versions of DOS running without Windows 95 that don't support long filenames. -- James R Curry - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The Balloon Doggies DEMANDED it!"
