Ian Collier wrote: > True. ... > I would assume so. ... > Also correct. :o)
Well, I try my best :-) > > maybe having a common routine for 'memory accesses' which adjusts to the > > next 4-tstate or 8-tstate boundary *at that point* rather than trying to > > work it all out when the instruction starts. > > Mmm. You're right; a bit tricky! ;-) > > Actually this could be done and might be moderately straightforward... > but it would be dog slow. > > imc Shouldn't matter when I get my 800MHz Athlon (if only...) ;-) David Laundon
