Perhaps Aley only sees the practical applications, and what he feels is
useful?  If something that already exists, why would anyone want to
re-invent it, etc.

I'm quite the opposite, and a big fan of because-it's-there.  I'll
happily spend hours investigating and implementing minor emulation
features, just because I know there's a difference, even if nothing
needs them.

While I'm happy to stop short of bus signals for my emulation habit, I
do see the appeal in going down to that level to learn more about how
things work.  An incredibly accurate emulation is just a handy byproduct
of the learning process :)

The hardware solutions are cool in their own right, but for maximum
tinkerability I'll always prefer the software solutions.

Si

On 13/04/2012 21:36, Thomas Harte wrote:
> For the purposes of debate, I think the counterargument would be that
> a software approach is inherently more portable and so more
> maintainable and more suited to a wide audience. Furthermore, there's
> no automatic advantage to doing things in hardware, given that these
> systems are fully deterministic and well understood, other than that
> it can be easier to get right, but that's primarily because the
> emulation mindset doesn't normally consider absolute accuracy to be a
> paramount concern. That's why you very often see people write
> emulators where interrupt timing is rounded to the nearest whole
> instruction, palette changes are accurate only to the nearest whole
> scan line, etc. Authors often prefer to make a subjective judgment
> about what's 'accurate enough' so that they can prioritise ease of
> development and/or performance.
> 
> Summary then: emulation carries no inherent accuracy penalty.
> 
> Alternatively, as a person who prefers functionality, surely you can
> see the benefit in emulation, which is all functionality and no form?
> The hardware becomes a completely orthogonal issue.
> 
> On 13 April 2012 11:32, Aleš Keprt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I don't share your thoughts. There already exist a lot of Spectrum clones
>> based on real ULAs and real Z80 and imo these are much better alternatives
>> than what you described. You can already buy anything you can imagine. So
>> many alternatives already exist and were created by huge fan base in the
>> past, that I can hardly imagine that somebody can really come today driven
>> by just marketing or business visions and create something significantly
>> better or more compatible or more useful.
>>
>> For example: I personally prefer functionality, not the look of that crappy
>> original keyboard. So I would prefer a PC keyboard, CF memory card instead
>> of tapes or disks, and real ULA (i.e. 100% accurate ULA clone), standard 128
>> KB RAM, and real Z80 CPU.
>> For other people who prefer or require the original ZX Spectrum case, they
>> can buy a new "internals" - this was already possible to buy 10 or more
>> years ago. (I personally has a working original ZX Spectrum+ and working
>> original Sam Coupe. :-))
>>
>> I think you are too focused on emulators - why would anybody put a today's
>> computer with an emulator inside an old ZXS box? It's just funny, not
>> worthy. I prefer either emulator on a proper PC computer, or original 8bit
>> Zilog Z80 in an original box. :-))
>>
>> Aley
>>
>> -----Původní zpráva----- From: [email protected]
>> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 12:18 PM
>>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: ZX Spectrum 'relaunch'
>>
>> Off on a bit of a non-SAM tangent (but probably somewhat related for
>> most of us) I came across this the other day:
>>
>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/video-games/8304237/ZX-Spectrum-relaunch-gaming-goes-back-to-the-future.html
>>
>> Lots of you have probably already heard this, but I don't remember it
>> being mentioned, so thought I would! ;-)
>>
>> Supposedly a company were going to relaunch the zx spectrum this year
>> (by the looks of it, as a 48k speccy keyboard that links up to an
>> iPhone or similar to run an emulator), to coincide with the 30th
>> anniversary, but it doesn't look like it's going to materialise any
>> time soon. I know something similar is/was being planned for the C64?
>>
>> However, it got me thinking... Obviously in this day and age, many of
>> use want to enjoy the retro gaming experience, but we haven't exactly
>> got the space to keep things set up. I intend to have my SAM set up
>> permanently at some point, but I very much doubt I'd ever get the
>> space to dedicate to other systems, so clearly something that
>> pleasantly replicates the original experience quickly and easily with
>> modern advantages would be a pleasing alternative.
>>
>> So I figured, what would make an easy to use 'spectrum' emulator for
>> playing all the old games? You'd want HDMI output for ease with modern
>> televisions, SD card storage, and have it all fit into one of our old
>> rubber keyed friends. How do you do this on a budget at that size? The
>> first thing that popped into my head, is the Raspberry Pi (if it ever
>> gets to selling!!). Small enough to probably fit in a speccy case,
>> with HDMI out and card reader. Surely this could make for a fairly
>> cheap and effective 48k Spectrum emulation experience?
>>
>> I think the Speccy is particularly suited, because let's face it, for
>> most of us it was about the games more than anything. I don't think
>> anything similar would work for the SAM, because what makes that such
>> a unique experience (for me, anyway) is the original and additional
>> hardware in addition to the software. But for a speccy I could see it
>> being great fun, to play the games with ease on a keyboard that
>> replicates the old experience but with updated advantages. (I think a
>> SAM equivalent would have to be more along the lines of Colin's
>> 'SAM-in-a-can' projects, but rather than old SAM parts, something that
>> accurately replicates the original hardware with modern additions)
>>
>> Not being much of a tech person I'm not sure about the feasibility,
>> but it seems like a wasted opportunity in todays market where
>> retro-gaming has had somewhat of a resurgence?
>>
>> Warren
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------
>> Mgr. Aleš Keprt, Ph.D.
>> private: [email protected], www.keprt.cz
>> office: Moravian College / Moravská vysoká škola Olomouc, [email protected]

Reply via email to