New York Times
OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR
Note to the U.N.: Hands Off Iraqi Politics
By CHIBLI MALLAT
January 19, 2004

BEIRUT - When members of the Iraqi Governing Council and L. Paul Bremer III,
the American administrator in Baghdad, open talks at the United Nations
today, nothing short of the future of the region will be at stake. Having
come under increasing pressure over its plan to form an Iraqi government
without direct elections, the United States is counting on greater United
Nations involvement both to help ease the resistance and secure a lasting
democracy.

Beyond the involvement of additional stakeholders like France and Germany,
can a more determined role on the part of the United Nations translate into
government-building? Considering the organization's dismal record of silence
during Saddam Hussein's 30 years of totalitarian rule, I'm not so sure.

Having visited Iraq last month to meet with the leadership there, I think
the better solution already lies within the nation's borders. To spend a day
at the 25-member Iraqi Governing Council headquarters is to learn what all
honest people in the Arab world already admit: the most representative of
all governments in the Middle East sits in Baghdad. With all its
shortcomings and contradictions, the council covers the fullest possible
spectrum of Iraqi society, from the Islamists to the Communists, and all the
strands in between, including Shiites, Sunnis, Kurds, Turkmens and
Christians.

The continued disagreements in the United Nations over the justification for
overthrowing Saddam Hussein and problems with securing postwar peace mask
the one major achievement in the new Iraq: within the governing council and
outside, freedom reigns supreme. It may sometimes look or sound messy to the
rest of the world, but a fledgling democracy often does.

In a heartening sign, no one in Iraq, no matter what side of the debate he
is on, is afraid to speak his mind. At the Baghdad airport, for example, an
Iraqi employee expressed to me his regret that Saddam Hussein had been
caught, and his hope that resistance will survive his arrest.

On the other hand, when I asked Dr. Ibrahim Bahr al-Uloum, Iraq's interim
oil minister, about criticism by Baathists within his ministry for his close
ties to the United States, he shrugged off the possibility of silencing
them. This is especially remarkable, given he had lost several family
members to Saddam Hussein's repression.

During my trip, I visited the Bahr al-Uloum home in Najaf, where some 50
tribal leaders from the Middle Euphrates Valley sang of their attachment to
Iraq, Shiism and national unity from the mountain to the marsh. The family's
patriarch, Sheikh Muhammad Bahr al-Uloum, a member of the governing council
and an old friend, is optimistic about Iraq's future. But Sheikh Uloum, who
like many struggled for decades against Saddam Hussein's dictatorship, is
also upset at what he perceives as mismanagement of his country by the
United States. More than eight months after the passing of the ancien
r�gime, the scene is of intermittent electricity and phone service, no
airport service and surreal lines for gas in a country with the second
largest oil reserves.

But security, despite newspaper headlines, is a fleeting concern. After all,
armed resistance to the new democratic order has no chance of success
against the new spirit of freedom if basic services are restored, and if the
national political process takes root. This is clearly the dual challenge
ahead, and Iraqis rightly feel they are in the best position to run their
country.

The way forward, then, is simple. The 10 members of the governing council
whom I met with agree on this: the council, as a national unity government,
should be unconditionally recognized as in charge of Iraq's destiny, with
the support of the United States-led coalition and whoever else wishes to
join in a democratic course of reconstruction.

As such, the council would be deemed the official interim government of
Iraq - making the United States plan to select a national assembly by July 1
unnecessary. The council would be empowered to draft a constitution and set
the parameters for what a new government would look like and when and how it
would be elected. In the long term, this would consolidate the whole process
of democracy - something Iraqis both in and outside the council want.

Strengthening the power of Iraqis over their own affairs can come with the
proviso that any contender who furthers his own political agenda by violent
means should be punished by either being banned from a leadership post or
being brought to trial by an international court for those crimes. Human
rights monitors, supported by the United Nations or the coalition, should be
deployed to further ensure international commitment to the cause of
democracy and nonviolence.

Today's meeting at the United Nations provides the perfect opportunity to
focus the future of Iraq in the right direction: inward. When I met in
Baghdad with Naseer Chaderji, a liberal Sunni Arab who sits on the governing
council, he voiced skepticism of of the United States' reaction to a request
for an acceleration of Iraqi self-governance. While Paul Bremer was a good
listener, Mr. Chaderji explained, he was not following suggestions made by
Iraqi leaders.

But after discussing the issue with other council members - including Ahmad
Chalabi and Ibrahim Jafari, an Islamist Dawa leader - as well as with
American officials committed to Middle East democracy, including Paul
Wolfowitz, I am more hopeful. I sense that Iraqis and Americans are far more
in agreement on the country's future than the controversies there suggest.
Now that the most dictatorial system in the region has been undone, the rest
of the world owes Iraq's long-ignored victims a commitment to their national
unity government.

Chibli Mallat is a law professor at the University of St. Joseph in Beirut
and author of a book on the slain Iraqi cleric Mohammad Bakr al-Sadr.



Reply via email to