Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 07:56:20PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Back our volker's patch as was breaking the build. > > Sorry for breaking it. On my machine it compiled well
Not as actually commited - you had an undeclared variable in there. >, I even tested against > smbclient, NT4 and W2k. At least on Linux with shadow passwords you do not get > the password salt from /etc/passwd but from /etc/shadow. On my machine an 'x' > ended up in the salt, which was definitely not what crypt wanted to see. > > What kind of fix do you propose? Changing to a default of encrypted passwords > should IMHO not mean we do not support plaintext at all anymore. I don't mind fixing it - I was mainly worried about the compile failure. Things that don't compile don't ususally look tested ;-) I also just want to look over it carefully, as much for my own benifit in understanding this crazy stuff. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
