On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 22:29, Volker Lendecke wrote: > Hi, Andrew! > > > If you specify a service type (ie. you don't send '?????' as the > > service type) then windows will check that this service type matches > > the service you are connecting to and will return > > NT_STATUS_BAD_DEVICE_TYPE if it doesn't match. > > Thanks for the clarification! > > With the following patch HEAD passes the (new) TCONDEV > test. NT4SP6/W2kSP3 also pass that, I did not check anything older > though. > > I'm not sure if share_sanity_checks is the right place to put these > checks, but it looked best to me.
Yep, it's the right place. Could we extend our client lib to return the "servers" value for that share? That way we could also check what we get back for "?????". (another field on the cli struct would seem like the right place) Once this is in the tree, I'll update the build farm to run it, so we never fail again... :-) Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
