On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Jim McDonough wrote: > >The only remaining case, it seems to me, that is not handled is where > >someone does wbinfo -A when they meant to do wbinfo -a and they also > >supply account details that are powerful enough to do what is needed but > >are not the ones they intended to supply. > Yes, and this is enough reason to remove -A. I've more than once run into > folks who did this. As soon as that user changed his password, it was all > over. Perhaps changing it to a different letter would be ok, if you're > really set on a short version (though there are other wbinfo options that > don't). It was a mistake for me to have put in the -A to begin with. I > should have used a different letter. But now is the time to get rid of it, > or we'll be seeing a lot more "me too"s on this.
Hmmm, well, that is a much better reason that what I saw before ... perhaps we need this level of explanation in the commit messages? Regards ----- Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
