Author: tridge
Date: 2005-09-26 01:12:12 +0000 (Mon, 26 Sep 2005)
New Revision: 10492

WebSVN: 
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=10492

Log:

work around a bug in solaris which cases lock upgrades to fail with
EDEADLK even when progress can be made. This is not a good solution,
but I can't find anything better.

Modified:
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/tdb/common/lock.c
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/tdb/common/tdb_private.h
   branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/tdb/common/transaction.c


Changeset:
Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/tdb/common/lock.c
===================================================================
--- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/tdb/common/lock.c     2005-09-25 21:01:56 UTC 
(rev 10491)
+++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/tdb/common/lock.c     2005-09-26 01:12:12 UTC 
(rev 10492)
@@ -81,6 +81,32 @@
 }
 
 
+/*
+  upgrade a read lock to a write lock. This needs to be handled in a
+  special way as some OSes (such as solaris) have too conservative
+  deadlock detection and claim a deadlock when progress can be
+  made. For those OSes we may loop for a while.  
+*/
+int tdb_brlock_upgrade(struct tdb_context *tdb, tdb_off_t offset, size_t len)
+{
+       int count = 1000;
+       while (count--) {
+               struct timeval tv;
+               if (tdb_brlock_len(tdb, offset, F_WRLCK, F_SETLKW, 1, len) == 
0) {
+                       return 0;
+               }
+               if (errno != EDEADLK) {
+                       break;
+               }
+               /* sleep for as short a time as we can - more portable than 
usleep() */
+               tv.tv_sec = 0;
+               tv.tv_usec = 1;
+               select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, &tv);
+       }
+       return -1;
+}
+
+
 /* a byte range locking function - return 0 on success
    this functions locks/unlocks 1 byte at the specified offset.
 

Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/tdb/common/tdb_private.h
===================================================================
--- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/tdb/common/tdb_private.h      2005-09-25 
21:01:56 UTC (rev 10491)
+++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/tdb/common/tdb_private.h      2005-09-26 
01:12:12 UTC (rev 10492)
@@ -216,6 +216,7 @@
 int tdb_lock(struct tdb_context *tdb, int list, int ltype);
 int tdb_unlock(struct tdb_context *tdb, int list, int ltype);
 int tdb_brlock(struct tdb_context *tdb, tdb_off_t offset, int rw_type, int 
lck_type, int probe);
+int tdb_brlock_upgrade(struct tdb_context *tdb, tdb_off_t offset, size_t len);
 int tdb_brlock_len(struct tdb_context *tdb, tdb_off_t offset, 
                   int rw_type, int lck_type, int probe, size_t len);
 int tdb_write_lock_record(struct tdb_context *tdb, tdb_off_t off);

Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/tdb/common/transaction.c
===================================================================
--- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/tdb/common/transaction.c      2005-09-25 
21:01:56 UTC (rev 10491)
+++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/tdb/common/transaction.c      2005-09-26 
01:12:12 UTC (rev 10492)
@@ -772,7 +772,7 @@
        }
 
        /* upgrade the main transaction lock region to a write lock */
-       if (tdb_brlock_len(tdb, FREELIST_TOP, F_WRLCK, F_SETLKW, 0, 0) == -1) {
+       if (tdb_brlock_upgrade(tdb, FREELIST_TOP, 0) == -1) {
                TDB_LOG((tdb, 0, "tdb_transaction_start: failed to upgrade hash 
locks\n"));
                tdb->ecode = TDB_ERR_LOCK;
                tdb_transaction_cancel(tdb);

Reply via email to