On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 04:32:30PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Rafal, > > > Well, yes, you're right. I messed the order :) But it should be ok, > > to reverse the order of inclusion - defined paths first, local dir > > second. This would allow not to substitue commonly used include files > > and still be able to include something local. > > no, it's not OK. It's _never_ ok. > > Imagine that Samba is installed in /net/some_nfs/drive/samba and nfs > is down. What happens then? smbstatus then goes to '.' and the > security hole is back. > > Please just revert the patch. There is no way we should ever be > looking in '.' for scripts or libraries of any kind.
ok, you're right. My foolish mistake. It's reverted now. My life is more complicated back again ;-) cheers, -- Rafal Szczesniak Samba Team member http://www.samba.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
