On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:48:58AM -0700, James Peach wrote: > On May 24, 2007, at 12:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/lib/replace/replace.h > >=================================================================== > >--- branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/lib/replace/replace.h 2007-05-24 > >01:57:02 UTC (rev 23107) > >+++ branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/lib/replace/replace.h 2007-05-24 > >07:15:36 UTC (rev 23108) > >@@ -111,11 +111,6 @@ > >extern int errno; > >#endif > > > >-#if defined(HAVE_LINUX_READAHEAD) && ! defined(HAVE_READAHEAD_DECL) > >-ssize_t readahead(int fd, off64_t offset, size_t count); > >-#endif > >- > >- > >#ifndef HAVE_STRDUP > >#define strdup rep_strdup > >char *rep_strdup(const char *s); > >@@ -326,6 +321,12 @@ > >#ifndef RTLD_LAZY > >#define RTLD_LAZY 0 > >#endif > >+#ifndef RTLD_NOW > >+#define RTLD_NOW 0 > >+#endif > >+#ifndef RTLD_GLOBAL > >+#define RTLD_GLOBAL 0 > >+#endif > > Is there any expectation that this is actually going to work? If we > cabn't figure out the header that these definition live in, then > making them up isn't necessarily going to help, eg. on AIX RTLD_GLOBAL > appears to be 0x100. I don't know any system that defines them *all* > to zero. > > If ldb requires these definitions, Id suggest simply disabling shared > library support in lds unless they are present. That seems safer that > passing an arbitrary (random?) value into dlopen.
You are probably right. My primary goal was to get the build working on a system at all. I have taken the defines from heimdal/lib/hdb/hdb.c more or less blindly... I have to reconsider this. Cheers, Michael
