------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 551
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Andrew Tridgell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
branch nick: tridge
timestamp: Mon 2007-07-02 18:24:43 +1000
message:
  merge from ronnie
added:
  scsi/                          scsi-20070702055133-iclxpxa82pdb3ue6-1
  scsi/scsi_io.c                 scsi_io.c-20070702055133-iclxpxa82pdb3ue6-2
modified:
  Makefile.in                    makefile.in-20061117234101-o3qt14umlg9en8z0-1
  tcp/ctdb_tcp.h                 ctdb_tcp.h-20061127103747-l8xeniwiapbydehq-3
  tcp/tcp_connect.c              tcp_connect.c-20061128004937-x70q1cu5xzg5g2tm-1
  tcp/tcp_init.c                 tcp_init.c-20061128004937-x70q1cu5xzg5g2tm-2
  tcp/tcp_io.c                   tcp_io.c-20061128004937-x70q1cu5xzg5g2tm-3
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 432.1.88
    merged: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    committer: Ronnie Sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    branch nick: ctdb
    timestamp: Mon 2007-07-02 16:13:31 +1000
    message:
      get rid of some compiler warnings for the scsi tool
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 432.1.87
    merged: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    committer: Ronnie Sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    branch nick: ctdb
    timestamp: Mon 2007-07-02 15:51:38 +1000
    message:
      add incomplete code fragments to perform SCSI PERSISTENT RESERVATION 
      calls to a scsi device.
      
      added to bzr so it will not be lost
      
      
      we need access to an array that supports this optional cdb before we
      can proceed and toolify it properly
      
      (the idea is that ctdb should have a mechanism where it can shut out
      nodes from accessing the LUNs when it has deemed a node as disconnected)
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 432.1.86
    merged: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    committer: Ronnie Sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    branch nick: ctdb
    timestamp: Mon 2007-07-02 14:26:50 +1000
    message:
      rename tnode->queue to tnode->out_queue to indicate this queue is for 
      sending data out to the other node
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 432.1.85
    merged: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    committer: Ronnie Sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    branch nick: ctdb
    timestamp: Mon 2007-07-02 14:10:20 +1000
    message:
      when accepting an incoming connection, verify that the source address is 
      from one of the configured nodes and reject the connection othervise
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 432.1.84
    merged: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    committer: Ronnie Sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    branch nick: ctdb
    timestamp: Wed 2007-06-27 08:44:42 +1000
    message:
      merge from tridge
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 432.1.83
    merged: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    committer: Ronnie Sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    branch nick: ctdb
    timestamp: Tue 2007-06-26 04:04:00 +1000
    message:
      merge from tridge
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 432.1.82
    merged: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    committer: Ronnie Sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    branch nick: ctdb
    timestamp: Mon 2007-06-18 03:15:28 +1000
    message:
      merge from tridge
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 432.1.81
    merged: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    committer: Ronnie Sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    branch nick: ctdb
    timestamp: Mon 2007-06-18 03:14:06 +1000
    message:
      merge from tridge

Diff too large for email (1036, the limit is 200).

Reply via email to