On Jan 16, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Tim Prouty wrote:
On Jan 16, 2009, at 7:13 AM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Since the max property isn't standard, this makes it harder to port
> our IDL code to other IDL compilers. It would be nice to just keep
the
> range() property and just check the data type of the variable to see
> if we need to check the lower bound.
I didn't take portability into consideration, but that's a good
point. I'll work on a better fix that doesn't add a new property over
the weekend.
This is now fixed in master. Thanks again for catching this :)
-Tim
