On Nov 25, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Tim Prouty wrote:
The branch, master has been updated
via 17caf63... s3 selftest: Add RAW-SFILEINFO-END-OF-FILE to
selftest
via af610a6... s3 setfileinfo: Open with FILE_WRITE_DATA when
setting the file size
via b6f9722... s4 torture: Change RAW-OPLOCK to use the
documented version of SET_END_OF_FILE_INFO
via 98f5950... s4 torture: Allow onefs to be checked like
samba3 and samba4
via 6074a05... s4 torture: Add two new setfileinfo tests
via ce9ac3a... s4 torture: Split up the torture suite setup
for RAW-SFILEINFO
from 56eca75... The start of a WHATSNEW for Samba4 alpha9
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
commit ce9ac3a685e2a23b30952bf20dbe3f9bf24dfaaa
Author: Tim Prouty <[email protected]>
Date: Tue Nov 24 16:25:02 2009 -0800
s4 torture: Split up the torture suite setup for RAW-SFILEINFO
A side effect of this change is that RAW-SFILEINFO now runs the
whole
suite instead of just the first test. I changed the name of the
first
test to RAW-SFILEINFO-BASE and changed all of the selftest scripts
that call it.
I would like to solicit some help from a selftest/samba 4 expert on
how to get selftest working with this recent commit.
RAW-SFILEINFO was explcitly defined in raw.c along with subtests such
as RAW-SFILEINFO-BUG. I modified RAW-SFILEINFO to reference the suite
of tests which now includes subtests such as RAW-SFILEINFO-BUG. Since
it is no longer possible to have a specific test called RAW-SFILEINFO,
I modified it to be called RAW-SFILEINFO-BASE.
I changed all of the samba3 make test references from RAW-SFILEINFO to
RAW-SFILEINFO-BASE, but I'm having trouble doing the same in samba4.
I tried changing source4/selftest/quick to include a line
"raw.sfileinfo.base" rather than "raw.sfileinfo", but it doesn't seem
to parse correctly and just skips the test. I could just remove it
from quicktest, but that seems like a last resort. Additionally, the
full 'make test' far samba4 needs a similar adjustment.
I've been looking at this now for a few hours and need some guidance
from someone who knows how this all fits together a little better than
me :).
Thanks!
-Tim
