On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 19:03 +0200, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote: > Jelmer, > > this is needed since we don't have implemented the functional level > change trigger yet (which would also adjust the second value after the > first change). > The tool should support both the actual unchecked s4 behaviour and the > Windows one - therefore this strange-looking exception handling.
Matthias, I think what Jelmer is getting at is: Have you used this tool against both servers, in the situation that you describe? It shouldn't be too hard to install a server in 2000 mixed functional mode to check, right? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
