On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 06:42:07PM -0500, Jeremy Allison wrote: > The branch, master has been updated > via 6a90307... Fix our NTLMSSP implementation against the Microsoft > torture tester. > from 829c876... Change data_blob() to be based on top of > data_blob_talloc(), instead of the reverse (as it is now). > > http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master > > > - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- > commit 6a903078cb133a1f46c9d6f24f50d863e31b743c > Author: Jeremy Allison <[email protected]> > Date: Tue May 18 16:32:13 2010 -0700 > > Fix our NTLMSSP implementation against the Microsoft torture tester. > > We need to return a version blob if we negotiate version info. > > Jeremy.
Hi Jeremy,
with this change we now announce ntlmssp capabilities just like w2k8r2/win7:
Version: struct VERSION
ProductMajorVersion : NTLMSSP_WINDOWS_MAJOR_VERSION_6 (0x6)
ProductMinorVersion : NTLMSSP_WINDOWS_MINOR_VERSION_1 (0x1)
ProductBuild : 0x1db0 (7600)
Reserved : 000000
NTLMRevisionCurrent : NTLMSSP_REVISION_W2K3 (0xF)
Is that really what we should do ? (I was just thinking of all the new MsAv
types like channel bindings, restrictions, etc.). Can we be sure that we
are not raising wrong expectations on the client side ?
Cheers,
Guenther
--
Günther Deschner GPG-ID: 8EE11688
Red Hat [email protected]
Samba Team [email protected]
pgpcPKgQ8BWHE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
