Has there been any progress on this problem? If there is anybody looking into this fault can you please shoot me an e-mail.
Thanks, Tony --- Tony Jago, System Administrator, E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Server and Security Group, Phone: +61 7 33654078 Information Technology Services, Fax: +61 7 33654065 The University of Queensland. Brisbane, Australia. 4072. On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, David Collier-Brown wrote: > David Lee wrote: > > In other words, perverse though it may at first seem, might Solaris sites > > be seeing this problem because Solaris is a _good_ OS, capable of being > > pushed to such limits? (Have other OSes stumbled on the lower slopes of > > the load mountain?) > > Formally, this is a bottleneck problem, caused > by the slow parts of the system not being up to > the standards of the rest. > > Depending on hat worn, you can make it a compliment > (most of the system is fast) or and insult (part > of the system is slow). I'll leave that to the > interested paries > > As an engineer, I'd prefer it not happen at all if > I can't fix it, and for it to be a Sun bug if I can. > My initial thought is it's partially die to a locking > bottleneck and partly due to the algorithm using > the lock being unbounded-time. > > --dave > For RTTL background, see > http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~jonathan/publications.htm > and Ostroff, J.S. "Temporal Logic for Real-Time Systems". > -- > David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify > Performance & Engineering | some people and astonish the rest. > Americas Customer Engineering, | -- Mark Twain > (905) 415-2849 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
