> > There is no way you can avoid DDNS if you want to use AD. None. > > W2K-Clients use DNS to find their servers. (You could make > static DNS > > entries, but this would not be > > very admin-friendly...) > > When it comes to Windows admins, *I'm* not very > admin-friendly, either. I was specifically asking whether > this could be done with static DNS entries; I'm glad to hear > the answer is yes.
As long as your able to resolve names it should be ok ? What about the kerberos thing in Win2000 ? Active Directory seems also to bind junk data to DNS entry. For any FULL compliant "compability" with 2000 core, I guess it's needed ? At least dns is better than lame netbios shoutings :) -- Ulf
