I just upgraded to 2.2.5 and still see my problem. Are we perhaps seeing different things?
On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 15:55, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > Simo: I'm wondering if this could be related to the caching bug you > found in my code while we were at SambaXP. I believe that you and > Jeremy fixed the latter bug for 2.2.5. > > Chris -)----- > > Terry Davis wrote: > > > > Sorry, forgot version. > > > > 2.2.4 > > > > Here is how it was configured: > > configure \ > > --with-automount \ > > --with-smbmount \ > > --with-pam \ > > --with-mmap \ > > --with-quotas \ > > --without-smbwrapper \ > > --with-libsmbclient \ > > --with-utmp \ > > --with-acl-support \ > > --with-profile \ > > --disable-static \ > > --with-ldapsam > > > > On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 14:35, Terry Davis wrote: > > > I am seeing some inconsistencies on files that have very similar names. > > > > > > Here is my share: > > > [ftp] > > > comment = FTP Directories > > > path = /home > > > browsable = yes > > > writeable = no > > > valid users = @csr,@system,@technical,@financial > > > write list = @system > > > force group = csr > > > create mode = 0664 > > > directory mode = 0775 > > > > > > I have a person in the csr group trying to open two files: > > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 13301 csr 108681 Jun 20 12:37 File1.txt > > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 13301 csr 170180 Jun 20 12:32 FILE1.TXT > > > > > > They are named exactly like that, I made no name changes. > > > > > > The sizes are different but the contents that are displayed to the user > > > are exactly the same. I am wondering if samba is improperly showing the > > > user cached contents. I did verify that if I rename one of the files, > > > the correct contents are displayed for both files. > > > > > > thank you! > > > > > > -- > > > Terry Davis > > > http://approbation.org/ > > -- > > Terry Davis > > http://approbation.org/ > > -- > Christopher R. Hertel -)----- University of Minnesota > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Networking and Telecommunications Services -- Terry Davis http://approbation.org/
