> I know it is possible to use "map archive" to keep track of archive
> bits, but this is not very useful if you have real UNIX users. I.e. I
> can't have samba arbitrarily playing with the execute bits.
Agreed ...
> Does anyone know of any attempted implementation of archive bits through
> extended attributes? This would probably need a VFS layer, to get and
> set them appropriately.
I have asked this question before, but got no responce ...
> If no one has looked into this is there a better/different way of
> tracking archive bits?
I remember searching the mail list archives, and somebody else proposed
this, but I don't think anybody has done anything ...
If anybody is going to looking into this, could they keep it on the list,
thanks.
Mailed
Lee
