On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: > Richard Sharpe wrote:
Max, I don't know why we are arguing, and I am sorry for any 'implicit' insults. Please keep on doing the work you are doing, and I am sure it will be gladly accepted. > > On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: > > > > Hmmm, I was responding to your complaint that BuildRequires should be > > updated and the 'implied' claim that we, the Samba team, should provide > > information about the minimum 'packages' required to build Samba. > > In the .spec file I examined, there was no BuildRequires section. > The implication was that you might want to include one. You can hardly > 'update' something that does not exist. 'diff -N' is one example :-) Regards ----- Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
