> 3. The report claims 163.471 MBytes of data Transferred, yet a full > capture is larger than 334 MBytes (that capture dropped a few frames).
Generally my Netbench reported peak throughput is about 10-15% lower than what I see in my sar report. The only thing that comes to mind is that the numbers NetBench reports are based on file data, and not all network data (header, etc), but I can't see how this would be 2x difference. I would generally expect whatever Netbench reports, the capture would be smaller due to client caching. -Andrew Theurer
