Jim Myers wrote: > > The IFSTEST suite is only available as part of the IFS development > kit.
OK. > There are a number of other differences I have found running other > parts of IFSTEST. > If I fix (some of) these, what should I do with the fixes? Send them here, and (possibly, but I don't particulary use it) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as diff -u. > Am I correct in assuming that Samba shares should produce exactly the > same results, including error codes as IFSTEST? We must produce the same results as a remote Win2k server, particulary including error codes. (Many subtle bugs lie in those error codes...) Even better would be to be able to replicate Win2k when it speaks DOS error codes too (you would need to use smbfilter), but we *know* that our NTSTATUS codes are often wrong, and need fixing. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
