Sorry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >WE are running RH 7.2/7.3 with Samba 2.2.3a and have not seen any problems with the >few PCs we have upgraded to SP3 yet. > >Regards, > >Alan B. Moote >Systems Administrator >MARK IV Industries >tel: 905.624.7908 >fax: 905.625.6197 > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ----- > >To: "'Richard Sharpe'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: 08/08/2002 02:58PM >cc: Dan Shearer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: ALERT - POSSIBLE SAMBA BLOCK IN WIN 2K SP3 > >Just wondering where did you install samba ( i mean what version of samba >and what unix flavor ) > >we are running samba-2.2.5/samba-2.0.7 on solaris platform, with w2k clients >accesssing unix share via samba > >am concerned if w2k cleints get sp3 updgrade , this will have any impact > >thanks in advance. > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 2:29 PM >To: James Leone >Cc: Dan Shearer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: ALERT - POSSIBLE SAMBA BLOCK IN WIN 2K SP3 > > >On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, James Leone wrote: > > > >>Hi Guys, >> >>Today, I installed a fresh Windows 2000 workstation, and I had applied >>Samba the same way I do on every machine, but Samba seems to be blocked. >>I suspect Service Pack 3. >> >> > >OK, we are interested in this. Try 'use spnego = no' in the global section >of your smb.conf to see if that fixes the problem. They might have gone to >spnego. Hmmm, spnego might not be in Samba 2.2.x, so that might not be >the solution. > >It might also be sign and seal. You might have to switch off sign an seal >in Win2K with SP3. > > > >>I am going to test my theory out on another machine by applying Windows >>Service Pack 3 on a machine that works and see if there are any >>noticable changes. >> >>I hope this is a mistake on my part, but I wanted to let you know ASAP. >> >>James Leone >> >> > > >
