Thanks, Jeremy. The one thing I haven't looked at is whether older clients can handle these new-fangled tconX and ntcreate&X replies, or whether we'll have to fall back to the old ones based on remote_arch.
I'll try and patch HEAD soon with a proper fix both for share and file ACLs. - Shirish On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 04:15:20PM -0700, Shirish Kalele wrote: >> Steve, >> >> There are two extra DWORDs of similar form in the NTCreate&X replies sent >> by Windows 2000. Win2K sends 42 words instead of the known 34. >> >> While exploring client-side caching, I discovered that these are actually >> access masks for the "User" who's opening the file and "Everyone Else" >> respectively. These access masks are used instead of the original NTACL >> when the file is accessed offline through the CSC cache. The two access >> masks you are seeing are probably similar "Simple File Sharing" >> equivalents of share ACLs. >> >> Here's a small patch (against Samba 2.2.4) to illustrate SFS masks. You >> can see the effect different masks have on the files cached by CSC. > >Damn good work ! We should definately put this into HEAD. > >Thanks Shirish ! > >Jeremy. >
