On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:47:59PM -0600, Jim McDonough wrote: > >It looks like the recent changes to 'correct' NTLMSSP have broken NTLMv2 > >in some way - Probably in much the same way that we suddenly got LM > >based session keys once we got the rest correct. > Works fine for me, but I'm the first to admit I'm not sure how to verify > I'm really using NTLMv2. The samba logs seem to indicate it, and I set it > in my security policy (and it's the effective policy).
One way to tell is by looking at the session setup request with ethereal. If the password lengths are > 24 then you are using NTLMv2, otherwise it's just plain old NT and LANMAN. Tim.
