On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 16:37, Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:42:53PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 15:56, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > One is the username they wanted, the other is the username they got > > > (after the username map file). Similarly for domains - if the domain > > > they wanted is trusted, and we are not allowing trusted domains, or if > > > the domain doesn't exist, then we replace it with our own domain. > > > > > > We may still need their original username/domain for authenticaion > > > (NTLMv2 comes to mind in particular), hence why we keep both. > > > > What are you trying to do there? > > Why should we replace a domain name with another??? > > For instance, when lp_allow_trusted_domains() is set to false, > then user's domain name should is replaced with our domain name. > Authentication modules will then look for username in our domain's > SAM instead querying trusted domains.
Can you explain me why we should not simply fail? Simo. -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec s.r.l. via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
