[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oh thank goodness for that, I was worried when I saw the
> other message about the fix being --with-spinlocks as
> that's not a good solution.
>
> We can't hold back 2.2.6 for this unfortunately, we'll
> have to put something in the release notes about it -
> any chance of getting the patchid pre-allocated so we
> know what it will be ?
I don't know if that's doable, but I'll try:
with your permission I'll quote your last paragraph
in the request.
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
Performance & Engineering | some people and astonish the rest.
Americas Customer Engineering, | -- Mark Twain
(905) 415-2849 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
