Volker, we had many discussion in the past, we should really remove uid and gid from the passdb/sam/whatever and use the SID->[u,g]id mapping to know which is the right one. I would like to keep the Primary group rid in the user's accounts but that would also mean we should also integrate group handling code into the backends.
And in my honest opinion we should get out the possibility to have multiple backends active at the same time, I really think that move has put us back 6 months in development and has caused more problems than what the pros get with such a monster. Simo. On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 12:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi! > > Andrew, how do you think about that? > > Volker > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Key-ID ADE377D8, Fingerprint available: phone +49 551 3700000 > > iD8DBQE9lC4xZeeQha3jd9gRAjsKAJ9YZKxYOZf7/yOJaFimlLJj6c8HoACdFVZg > 8yejxszlhu7NZLdErlBUCO4= > =KjXV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec s.r.l. via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
