On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > I honestly doubt tdbsam is sufficiently stable for use as a default. I > think we need that kind of backend, but given it's extremly limited > testing, it worries me. Yes, this is circular dependency.
I know we originally talked about tdbsam being the default for 3.0, but it wasn't on that list posted after the CIFS conference (and no one really made a big deal out of it). If we did decide to do this, I agree with andrew that there is a lot of work to be done--stablizing, testing, migration, etc... That is an extremely critical part of code that most people don't care about for a simple file server. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org -- http://www.plainjoe.org "Sams Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
