Why is the GUID a secret? Can't it be a configuration file option? Really, it should be retrieved from the directory, but I appreciate that this is difficult with the existing SAMBA architecture.
-- Luke >From: "Jim McDonough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: nmbd cldap patch >To: Gerald Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:06:48 -0400 > > >>> Here's a link to the patch that aliguori wrote and I cleaned up to >respond >>> to the connectionless ldap v3 requests for netlogon info. >>> http://www-124.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/patches/?patch_id=540 >> >>Can we just check it in and surround if by an #ifdef ? Or is the code too >>stread out? >The problem is that it ends up including secrets.o in way too many links to >retrieve the domain GUID. It does need to be retrieved somewhere else, >IMO, and I don't really want to do that to Makefile.in. Otherwise it's not >to bad to do it... > >---------------------------- >Jim McDonough >IBM Linux Technology Center >Samba Team >6 Minuteman Drive >Scarborough, ME 04074 >USA > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Phone: (207) 885-5565 >IBM tie-line: 776-9984 > > -- Luke Howard | PADL Software Pty Ltd | www.padl.com
