----- Original Message ----- From: "Eddie Lania" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:21 AM Subject: Re: smbgroupedit and ldap groups?
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Eddie Lania" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:08 AM > Subject: Re: smbgroupedit and ldap groups? > > > > HI Eddie, > > > > >I am willing to try this, but I thought the "admin users" parameter > > >primairily is used in the services section and not as a global parameter? > > >So this parameter would only affect rights on a service. > > > > > >Am I right or wrong? > > > > a parameter marked as service parameter only says that you can specify it > > seperate for each service or use the default value of this parameter from > > the global section. > > > > so each service AND global parameter are in the globals section. > > > > > > > > metze > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > > Stefan "metze" Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Hi Metze, > > Then I guess the smb.conf html page should be adapted accordingly: > > > - From smb.conf.5.html: > > ------------- > admin users (S) > > This is a list of users who will be granted administrative privileges on the > share. This means that they will do all file operations as the super-user > (root). > You should use this option very carefully, as any user in this list will be > able to do anything they like on the share, irrespective of file > permissions. > > Default: no admin users > > Example: admin users = jason > ------------- > > > See what I mean? > > Eddie. > > And BTW, the UserManager for domains still doesn't work after this addition. Eddie.
