On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > The 'Samba Team' doesn't maintain smbfs, and without those changes a patch > to smbmount doesn't make to much sense. That said, I don't mind applying > them - but it's not been a priority.
I have a bunch of changes, mostly bugfixes, that I wanted in 2.2.6 but the patch got lost in samba-patches. That's fine, I didn't push it, but it has been there since July ... (don't bother with that version anymore, btw). I plan to split up what I have and send smaller pieces to samba-technical, or where ever patches should be sent to. The release are on a separate branch? I guess I don't have to wait until after 2.2.6 then. This patch contains most of the changes: http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/smbmount-2.2.5-misc-2.patch.gz I don't think it applies to 3.0 (but someone said it did?) but something similar is needed there, plus adding kerberos and "spnego" (+8/-6 lines). /Urban
