On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 05:55, Green, Paul wrote: > I need to make a change to the Samba (3.0 and head) makefiles because my > system has a required executable suffix. I know how to do this; I'm testing > the patch now. My question is, must I assume that Samba might be built by > some rather simplistic (to be kind) make programs, or can I assume that, > say, (GNU make) features like $(addsuffix ...) are universally available? > Judging by the existing makefile, the answer appears to be "assume the > worst..."
Correct, we have the joy of having to compile with nearly every 'make' imaginable, and any slightly ANSI C compliant compiler... Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
